GOOD INFORMATION. BETTER PEACE OF MIND.Español · Always free. No signup required.

Licensed Center · Texas

Mary's Little Lamb Academy

13450 Cullen Blvd, Houston

Last inspected Jun 17, 2026 · Map

No deficiencies cited

About this program

Licensed capacity
71
Ages served
Infant,Toddler,Pre-Kindergarten,School
Hours
06:00 AM-06:00 PM
Days
Mon,Tue,Wed,Thu,Fri
Programs
Before School Care,Meals Provided ,After School Care,Snacks Provided,Transportation to/from School
Accepts child care subsidies
Yes
License type
Full Permit
Issued
Sep 3, 2024
Phone
7132407599

No adverse action, corrective action or permit conditions on record.

State compliance summary

How many deficiencies Texas has recorded for this program, by risk level. This is not a quality rating: it describes compliance with the state’s minimum licensing standards.

11High risk
10Medium-high risk
5Medium risk
0Medium-low risk
0Low risk
14Inspections and investigations on record

Inspection history

Jun 17, 2026 · Inspection
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Feb 5, 2026 · Inspection
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Jan 26, 2026 · Complaint or incident investigation
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Aug 5, 2025 · Inspection
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Jul 22, 2025 · Inspection
3 deficiencies cited
  • Critical Required Admission Information - Emergency Contact
    Inspector's note: There were four out of eight children's files missing emergency contact info. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2025-07-25.
  • Non-critical Documented Annual Training - 6 Hours of annual training required
    Inspector's note: There were less than 24 hours of training for seven out of eight employee files. Risk level: Medium. Corrected by 2025-07-31.
  • Critical Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
    Inspector's note: There was a four year old child who walked into the office by himself. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-07-22.
Jul 9, 2025 · Inspection
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Jun 27, 2025 · Inspection
5 deficiencies cited
  • Critical Activities for Infants - Not in Restrictive Device for more than 15 Minutes
    Inspector's note: There was an infant seven months old in a bouncer for 25 minutes. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-06-30.
  • Non-critical Chairs - Safety Straps Used if Required by Manufacturer
    Inspector's note: Two children were not strapped in correctly to a highchair. This was corrected when the caregiver properly strapped in the children. Risk level: Medium. Corrected during the inspection.
  • Critical Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
    Inspector's note: There was a child aged 8 by himself in a classroom. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-06-30.
  • Critical Mark Cleaning Supplies, Toxic Materials; Keep Separate from Food and Inaccessible to Children
    Inspector's note: A teacher was using bleach on the floor where children were playing. This was corrected when the teacher put the bleach away. Risk level: High. Corrected during the inspection.
  • Critical Maximum Group Size 13 or More Children
    Inspector's note: There were 16 children between the ages of 16 months to two years old with one caregiver. This was corrected when a second caregiver entered the room. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2025-06-30.
Jun 25, 2025 · Complaint or incident investigation
1 deficiency cited
  • Critical Personal use of electronic devices, such as cell phones, MP3 players, tablets, and video games
    Inspector's note: There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that personal devices are being used by caregivers. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2025-07-21.
Jun 4, 2025 · Complaint or incident investigation
8 deficiencies cited
  • Critical Prohibited Punishments - Using Inappropriate Long Period of Silence or Inactivity Including Requiring Child to Remain in a Restrictive Device
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was placed in a crib as a form of discipline and made to remain in the crib for more than 30 minutes. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Non-critical Crib Activities
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a crib on numerous occasions for more than 30 minutes. Risk level: Medium. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Critical Prohibited Punishments - Grabbing and Pulling
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver aggressively grabbed and pulled a child by both arms and then again by one arm. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Critical Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an infant classroom was left out of ratio on numerous occasions when a caregiver left the room leave one caregiver alone with six, seven, eight, and nine children at different times of the day. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Critical Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was not adequately supervised when they were able to fall out of a crib. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Critical Basic Requirements for Infants - Holding and Comforting
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not comfort an upset infant when the infant was left upset and crying while the caregiver ignored the child. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Critical Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that good judgement was not used when a caregiver lied to a child?s parents and the DFPS investigator, as well as falsified an incident report regarding how a child received an injury Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
  • Critical Activities for Infants - Not in Restrictive Device for more than 15 Minutes
    Inspector's note: Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a restrictive device for more than 15 minutes Risk level: High. Corrected by 2025-07-11.
Feb 19, 2025 · Inspection
1 deficiency cited
  • Critical Requirements for Feeding Infants - No Walking or Sleeping with Bottle or Cup
    Inspector's note: An infant was observed sleeping with a bottle in the crib This was corrected during the inspection when I observed the caregiver remove the bottle from the crib. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected during the inspection.
Dec 5, 2024 · Inspection
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Nov 26, 2024 · Complaint or incident investigation
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Jul 3, 2024 · Complaint or incident investigation
No deficiencies cited

No infractions recorded at this inspection.

Jun 13, 2024 · Inspection
1 deficiency cited
  • Critical Infant Care Area Furnishings and Equipment -Use of Safety Straps
    Inspector's note: Two infants were observed not strapped in there high chairs. One out of the two children actually got out of the seat and was standing on top on the high chair. This was corrected during inspection when the caregiver removed all the children from the high chairs. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected during the inspection.
May 22, 2024 · Inspection
1 deficiency cited
  • Critical AP Background check results - Must receive notification prior to allowing subject to be present at your operation
    Inspector's note: One staff member was observed to be present at the operation without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit. This was corrected during the inspection when the director had the caregiver leave the operation. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2024-05-22.
May 14, 2024 · Inspection
1 deficiency cited
  • Non-critical Reduction of child/caregiver naptime ratio by 50% allowed, If 13 or more children in care, children are 18 mo. or older and other standards met
    Inspector's note: During the follow-up inspection a 17 month old infant was observed napping in a classroom with 31 children. The specified age group for the classroom is two. The max number of children that can be present is twenty two. Due to the infant being under 18 months, the nap time ratio can not be reduced by 50 percent. Risk level: Medium. Corrected by 2024-05-14.
May 6, 2024 · Inspection
2 deficiencies cited
  • Non-critical Reduction of child/caregiver naptime ratio by 50% allowed, If 13 or more children in care, children are 18 mo. or older and other standards met
    Inspector's note: During the inspection two infant classrooms were grouped together during nap time. There was a total of nineteen infants with three caregivers. The youngest child was eight months old and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The specified age group was fifteen months old. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom. Risk level: Medium. Corrected by 2024-05-06.
  • Critical Maximum Group Size 13 or More Children
    Inspector's note: An infant classroom had nineteen infants with three caregivers during nap time. The youngest child was eight months and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The classrooms specified age group was fifteen months. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2024-05-06.
Mar 7, 2024 · Inspection
1 deficiency cited
  • Critical Maintain Sand Boxes/Tables in Sanitary Manner
    Inspector's note: Three live ant beds were observed outside on the playground. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2024-03-15.
Jan 29, 2024 · Inspection
2 deficiencies cited
  • Critical Annual Fire Inspection - Before Initial Permit Issued and Every 12 Months
    Inspector's note: It was found that the fire inspection was not completed. Risk level: High. Corrected by 2024-02-09.
  • Critical Active Play Surfacing In Use Zones - Loose Fill or Unitary Surfacing
    Inspector's note: It was observed that the outside play structure does not have surfacing. Note: Picture was taken. Risk level: Medium High. Corrected by 2024-02-01.

Records come from Texas Health and Human Services, Child Care Regulation. They describe conditions on the inspection date and may not reflect current conditions.